Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Leave No Trace (2018)



dir. Debra Granik
writ. Debra Granik and Anne Rosselini, novel by Peter Rock (My Abandonment)
feat. Thomasin McKenzie, Ben Foster

A father and his daughter live in the wet green wilderness, foraging for food, water, and firewood, tending to their camouflaged camp and each other. Why they hide, we don't know, but they're steering clear of parkland personnel. Dad runs drills to see how quickly Tom can hide without showing tracks by which pursuers could find her. When she does poorly, they do it again. Only when they trek to the city do we know Portland, Oregon is nearby, though the stunningly photographed, damp dense forest screams Pacific Northwest.

And so starts Leave No Trace, landing the viewer in an unfamiliar world, nesting with two loving fugitives in their private paradise.

The story plays out beautifully and deliberately, that city trip revealing Dad’s veteran status, subsequent stops hinting at the opioid epidemic which seems to have strafed Dad's life, though he's clean. When Tom is spotted and the two are subsequently caught, their peaceful world is overturned. What follows is a fearful journey for the two, questions about their lives and Dad's mental well-being, as well as what's good for a developing child, and who should decide that answer. Their heartache, how they miss each other as they go through the bureaucracy's judgmental gauntlet is palpable. Better still is the humanity shown even by those bureaucrats, social workers who aren't just enforcing laws but also aiming to help the family. It's these touches that lend the film such depth, no easy answers to who is right or wrong.

They are thrown into unfamiliar social situations, and without backstory it's unclear if Tom has ever been around people, perhaps all social situations new and strange. Upon being reunited, the pair's world has changed, the societal rules pressing into their dimension. This feels unfair, the arguable paradise of their initial world challenged by the flat walls of an ordinary domicile. But, it's all of life and opportunity at stake here, and what's best for Dad might not be the same for Tom. And what if Dad doesn't have the capacity to judge that correctly. 

The drama that comes on the path of figuring out those answers is powerful and intimate, with single lines of dialogue changing the dynamic between the pair. Dad’s needs play against daughter’s, and the middle ground proves elusive. At its heart, the film is about the damage that one can and can’t endure, and the life one must live even if that's at odds with the needs of a loved one, forcing changes in the relationship. This complicated territory is challenging even to describe, and the elegance and simplicity with which the film delivers messages and emotional punch without sacrificing love or ever seeming less than completely genuine is astounding.

Of course, films fall into categories and subcategories, genres and story types, and I find that most films show themselves in the first few minutes and you know what you’re in for. Not every twist and turn or the precise ending, but you get the drill and could map out much of what’s to come. Much of the joy of watching Leave No Trace comes in not knowing what comes next. Of course, a few key conflicts will come. We do start with a school-age kid hiding on public land. But nearly everything else is a surprise, detail after detail of discovery, each new location and world unexpected, natural, and special. That's rare in films, particularly American ones, and it swells the heart to share Tom and her father's ride through earnest life adventures.


Saturday, January 12, 2019

Black Mirror: Bandersnatch (2018)



dir. David Slade
writ. Charlie Brooker
feat. Fionn Whitehead, Craig Parkinson, Alice Lowe, Will Poulter

Charlie Brooker and Black Mirror have brought loads of intelligent entertainment to the small screen, playfully delivering a tech-centric version of The Twilight Zone. I've long thought this tech-centric aspect narrows the focus too much, often leading down obvious and overwrought pathways of social media obsession or nanny parenting. But on the flip side, there are gifts of tales exploring the afterlife, the eerie powers of near-future tech, and self-referential delights. 


For anyone who read Choose Your Own Adventure books as a kid, the Bandersnatch experiment can't help but intrigue, even if a clear look back at those books would likely trigger little more than faint recollection of storylines and no specific title that ranks among favorite childhood reads. It's for this that I wonder if Bandersnatch was a doomed experiment from the start. As an Atari and early computer game player back in that day, dipping into the gaming world of the mid-80s excited me, as did seeing Will Poulter playing an adult instead of a wide-eyed kid. I found an early satisfaction in watching the story unfold while participating, curious where it would take me. And, I'm admittedly a sucker for any hallucinogenic ride to deeper consciousness and the other side of the looking glass. But right about there, my magic carpet took a dark dive that felt irreversible (and not my experience at all on such real life illuminating rides), with my choices becoming increasingly lame and narrowly differentiated. I would hesitate, thinking both ideas were lousy, the stuff of bad melodrama where kids (or adults) throw things and break expensive, important equipment. 


But the greatest gaff for me came when I found a loop that trapped me between choosing Netflix or Kill My Dad, locking me in repetition until I picked one. This turned my stomach, perhaps a cheap inside joke, like The Simpsons ripping on Fox, something perhaps about addiction to TV. Regardless, it rubbed the wrong way. 


Perhaps for the eager viewer, willing to restart and try every option, there is some satisfaction in the variety found, but as one who essentially went through once, while accepting a late loop offered at the end to try a few more choices, Bandersnatch came up short.


Most significantly, the only two alternate endings I saw felt virtually the same, despite a major difference (game success). And I recognized, therein lies the weakness in the concept. Since it's not a game, you don't Win by coming out "successful" and since there isn't a fixed path, a singular story, you don't win by enjoying a well-told tale either. This kind of undertaking needs far more ambition and (likely cost-prohibitive) budget to reach the scope of a world one could fall into and get lost, like an expansive modern game where you can accomplish set goals or wander off to find adventures that don't stick to the central narrative. Instead, Bandersnatch feels like a lose-lose situation.



Bird Box (2018)



dir. Susanne Bier
writ. Eric Heisserer (screenplay), Josh Malerman (novel)
feat. Sandra Bullock, Trevante Rhodes, John Malkovich, Sarah Paulson



--> Here there be spoilers. Ah, Netflix, you're a mad mess of productions. Living in Los Angeles while both Roma and Bird Box were released, it was fascinating to see both plastered over every available surface, including Bird Box buses that I took solely for mobile billboards, something you can park on the Venice boardwalk where there isn't a board to buy until I passed again to see a troop of meekly smiling suckers in blindfolds standing around the bus. 
While I don't know the BBB experience, it's at least shorter than the film viewing one, as well as partially blindfolded. The billboards alone were enough to give the scent of a reverse engineered apocalyptic sci-fi romp. What if the plague came in through the eyes and everyone had to be blindfolded?! And once the weed is slept off, you're stuck carrying that out. 

Bullock plays Malorie, a pregnant overwrought misanthropic artist who hates humanity enough that you can't fathom why she skipped the abortion before the don’t-look-or-you’ll-kill-yourself wind plague comes to town. The character is all broad strokes, sneers and castigating "wit" perhaps meant to be excused as artist's temperament. Sarah Paulson plays Jessica, Malorie's nice sister, briefly riding along for exposition until the aforementioned wind kicks up. We then slip into a low rent Stephen King's The Mist situation in a house where a real melting pot of characters fake conflict while annoying John Malkovich, who I wondered for a minute if he was playing himself, actually pissed at these intruders using his house as their sanctuary. 

Chaos and shouting carry the flick this far, but then we start breaking our world's rules, first with a blind drive through what we'd seen as impassable streets hours before, aided by a magical blinking console light. That alone would be fine, a film will stretch what's possible and needs twists. Fine. 

But there are too many successive amazing feats completed in blindfolds that quickly move from intriguing and challenging to tiresome and laughable. You can't help but wonder if the root of the story is a slim, God will save you, message. Maybe that would jibe with the crazy people who can survive the view, but in turn become even greater enemies. Then, maybe it's a Catholic Church-inspired apocalypse and the clear-eyed gnostics with their direct contact with the higher power are the most savage and lost, thus encouraging good people to operate blindly. Nah.

Instead, it feels like no one spent considerable effort thinking about how much time really passes in the film, instead just blocking out a handful of action scenes and those high risk blindfolded tasks. It's reminiscent of the faults of the count of those disappeared in The Leftovers (1 in 100 doesn’t affect everyone that deeply) or where you’d get all that damn sand in A Quiet Place. Yes Malorie, you’d name those kids, and no, even you wouldn't think you'd done everything for their survival.


Monday, July 12, 2010

35 rhums (35 Shots of Rum) (2008)


dir. Claire Denis
writ. Claire Denis and Jean-Pol Fargeau
feat. Alex Descas, Mati Diop, Nicole Dog, G
régoire Colin

Lionel (Descas) and
Joséphine (Diop) live quiet, busy lives, a father and daughter who have carved out a shared existence of love and support in the absence of other family. But hints of change and rebellion are in the air, and a man lurks outside the door of their apartment, a suitor with the filmmaker's suggestion of a home invader.

In Claire Denis' beautiful and tender tribute to Ozu, we find Descas in the traditional Chishu Ryu role as the aging parent and Diop filling in for Setsuko Hara, the devoted daughter who yearns for an independent life yet doesn't wish to abandon her lonely father. The film elegantly courts the threats of everyday life, two deaths haunting the story while little harm comes directly to our leads. Instead, intimate details shape and propel the tale: Jo
séphine's stumbling progress with Noé (the lurking suitor,) Lionel's harrowing vision of his future through a retired coworker, a visit to Joséphine's aunt that vaguely answers a few questions of family history.

The conflicts go unspoken, playing out in richly textured scenes of motion and emotion. As the substitute family of Lionel,
Joséphine, Noé, and Gabrielle (Dogue as the unrequited lover of Lionel) get caught in the rain and take shelter in a cafe, the caged feelings escape. Noé makes his move on Joséphine, taking the daughter from the awkward father, pressing him to demonstrate his still thriving manhood with the cafe owner, and thus leaving Gabrielle out in the cold. In the time it takes to play "Night Shift" by the Commodores, the dynamic has changed forever, inevitable and irreversible shifts in these lives taking place in a moment out of time, in a placed they would have never visited if not for car trouble and bad weather.

It is this combination of the incessant flow of life and good intentions of the characters that imbue the film with such charm and power. Lives will move onward, but the love between father and daughter will remain.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

How to Train Your Dragon (2010)


dir. Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders
writ.
Dean DeBlois, Chris Sanders, and William Davies, novel by Cressida Cowell
feat. Jay Baruchel, Gerard Butler, Craig Ferguson, America Ferrera

What a delightful surprise this film turned out to be. I knew it was a good sign when one article cited its lack of broad humor and pop culture references as the reason it didn't blow out the box office initially. Thankfully, it found an audience as one of the biggest sleepers of the year, holding rank for weeks. As one who can't count on his taste being easily transferable, I'll rarely raise the flag for a film. But for this one, I tell everyone to see it.

In this case, the trick is in telling a coming-of-age tale with an unusual setting and a unique spin on what makes the main character special. Hiccup (Baruchel) is a young Viking who yearns to slay dragons just like his Pop (Butler). Unfortunately, he's a pipsqueak who shows little promise and as we eventually find out, doesn't have the killer's instinct necessary to do the job. In first hitting, then learning to love the injured dragon, he finds false success as a master of dragons, for understanding instead of violence. This leads to some powerful conflict between father and son, a rift both distressing and plausible within the context of the world. It also sets up Hiccup as a great savior for his people and gives him room to save their way of life and mend things with Pop.

This plot summary doesn't do the story justice. Just as that initial backhanded compliment indicated, the clever writing and very human sensibility of the film and its characters keep it aloft and entertaining. When Hiccup learns to fly the dragon, we experience something utterly lacking in Avatar which, despite its astounding budget and frequent flying effects, never offered the same gasping sense of freefall that grips the viewer as Hiccup dives toward uncertainty. This has as much to do with the attachment to the character as it does with the animation or 3-D effects (can you name one notable characteristic of the main dude in Avatar? me neither). You are along for the ride, sympathetic to both the adorable dragon and the troubled Hiccup.

All of this while surrounded by stunning visuals, created with the support of none other than Roger Deakins, cinematographer for the Coen Brothers films, The Reader, Doubt, and many more, who consulted to bring greater depth to the lighting. And as a last note, the story is well rounded with a budding romance between Hiccup and Astrid, a sly diversion complete with digs about love feeling like a simultaneous kiss and a punch in the face.

Toy Story 3 (2010)


dir. Lee Unkrich
writ. Michael Arndt, story by John Lasseter, Andrew Stanton, and Lee Unkrich
feat. Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, Joan Cusack, Ned Beatty, Don Rickles, Michael Keaton, Wallace Shawn, John Ratzenberger

I'll admit I was afraid when I heard there was a third installment of Toy Story coming down the pipe. Sure, I'd been thrilled by the second one (after similar fears) and pleased by the bulk of Pixar's films, even stunned by many. Yet, Up lost it's momentum despite a strong start and Cars ran out of gas before it even got rolling. Plus, the tiresome push for more 3-D content loomed as a potential excuse to dance the toys across the screen one last time for a big show of unnecessary added dimension. Thankfully, the wizards of Pixar not only protected the property, but turned out what might be the best of the three, an unprecedented feat in movie threedom.

At their best, the Pixar gang get that great storytelling isn't just dynamic, packing in almost constant movement and frequent action set pieces, but also probes deeply, exploring multiple psychological levels and complicated relationships. Their utmost genius is demonstrated in their ability to combine these aspects in such a way that a child might appreciate an adventure about living toys struggling for survival while an adult will enjoy a tale about growing up, the fear of abandonment, and parting ways with
loved ones. All of this is packed into a seamless, riveting story that weaves its way through a variety of movie genres and subgenres that include a ditzy cheesy romance and a film noir jailbreak.

Through all the riotous and outlandishly inventive moments (Mr. Tortilla Head ranks highly among the funniest things I've ever seen in my life,) they never let go of the heartfelt story, each character pulling its weight, facing up to its decisions, and dealing with consequences. And through the highs and lows, they never let the enthusiasm and pacing drop for a moment. On top of that, there are none of the easy solutions common to such stories. Just when you expect a villain to show he's a good soul after all, he's just as rotten as before. Just when you know how the gang will get out of a dicey situation, that escape hatch closes. And just when you think you've seen it all, there is a moment that makes you believe the impossible could happen, that seems shockingly adult and frighteningly human for any age group and which sets the filmmakers so far apart from the rest of the pack that they seem to belong to another galaxy. And as you gasp and the tears come, another turn arrives, one so uplifting, so surprising yet so inevitable, and so perfect that it ties the whole world together and confirms (quite precisely) what you thought a moment ago about those talented folks behind the scenes.

Hell, that's not even the end. It's as though the toys had the allegorical coming-of-age experience that we will never see Andy, their owner, have as he heads off to college. Their separation and the accompanying anxiety follow, a denouement that crystallizes the heart of the story, a gentle and emotional summing up after the exciting heavy lifting. And maybe just here, there is a touch of indulgence in the happy ending, the toys finding renewed love and joy in a new owner and together.